Next: Multimedia Transport Protocols
Up: Internet Integrated Services
Previous: Internet Multicasting
Experts of the IETF and of the ATM Forum are developing techniques for running IP on top of local area ATM
networks. The proposed techniques are named Classical IP
and
LAN Emulation, respectively.
The problems of integrating real-time services in the IETF Classical IP architecture are
summarised in [RFC1821]. The main issues are the service model, the reservation model, and
QoS-aware routing.
As described above, the service model of Integrated Services Internet
architecture used service classes---such as best effort, guaranteed, predictive delay, and
controlled delay---for QoS specification. ATM in turn has five service classes, which are not
in direct correspondence with the IP classes:
- CBR (constant bit rate), which emulates a leased line, providing very tightly
constrained delay and designed for applications which can use a fixed bandwidth pipe.
- VBR (variable bit rate)--real-time, which attempts to constrain delay for
applications whose bandwidth requirements vary.
- VBR--non--real-time, intended for variable bandwidth applications without tight delay constraints.
- UBR (unspecified bit rate), which most closely approximates the best effort
service of traditional IP.
- ABR (available bit rate), which uses a complex feedback mechanism to control data loss.
The differences between the reservation models of RSVP and ATM (UNI 3.0) signalling are listed in Table
.
Table: Differences between RSVP and ATM UNI 3.0.
tspeuker@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de